This review policy applies to all academic papers submitted to Global Frontiers: ICEAHIM. Initially, contributors are required to submit a 300-350 word abstract of their work. The conference selection panel reviews all abstracts received by the published submission deadline, focusing primarily on the relevance of the proposed topic. If the abstract is deemed relevant, the author(s) are invited to submit a full paper, with a maximum length of 5,000 words.

Upon submission, the full paper undergoes a double-blind review by a member of the conference committee. This review is based on 10 key criteria to ensure the paper’s relevance to the conference, its quality for presentation and publication in the conference proceedings, and adherence to the submission guidelines set by the program committee. A copy of the Review Form used by reviewers is available [here]. If a paper is rejected by a reviewer, a second opinion will be sought, and the final decision will rest with the program chair.

The conference proceedings will be published in both print and electronic formats, each with an ISBN. Submission deadlines are available on the conference web page.

The conference may feature tracks that include presentations by consultants, professionals, and vendors. While these papers are accepted without the need for the same level of academic rigor as traditional academic papers, a formal written paper (rather than just PowerPoint slides) is still required for submission.